Apr 20 - 43,083 notes » via - source + reblog
# teen wolf




Tonight.
Apr 19 - 2,310 notes » via - source + reblog
# orphan black




writersprocrastinate:

Hi, I’m a writer. My hobbies include not writing. 


Apr 19 - 118,925 notes » via - source + reblog




america-wakiewakie:

Princeton Concludes What Kind of Government America Really Has, and It’s Not a Democracy | PolicyMic 
The news: A new scientific study from Princeton researchers Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page has finally put some science behind the recently popular argument that the United States isn’t a democracy any more. And they’ve found that in fact, America is basically an oligarchy.
An oligarchy is a system where power is effectively wielded by a small number of individuals defined by their status called oligarchs. Members of the oligarchy are the rich, the well connected and the politically powerful, as well as particularly well placed individuals in institutions like banking and finance or the military.
For their study, Gilens and Page compiled data from roughly 1,800 different policy initiatives in the years between 1981 and 2002. They then compared those policy changes with the expressed opinion of the United State public. Comparing the preferences of the average American at the 50th percentile of income to what those Americans at the 90th percentile preferred, as well as the opinions of major lobbying or business groups, the researchers found out that the government followed the directives set forth by the latter two much more often.
It’s beyond alarming. As Gilens and Page write, “the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.” In other words, their statistics say your opinion literally does not matter.
That might explain why mandatory background checks on gun sales supported by 83% to 91% of Americans aren’t in place, or why Congress has taken no action on greenhouse gas emissions even when such legislation is supported by the vast majority of citizens.
This problem has been steadily escalating for four decades. While there are some limitations to their data set, economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez constructed income statistics based on IRS data that go back to 1913. They found that the gap between the ultra-wealthy and the rest of us is much bigger than you would think…
(Read Full Text)

america-wakiewakie:

Princeton Concludes What Kind of Government America Really Has, and It’s Not a Democracy | PolicyMic 

The news: A new scientific study from Princeton researchers Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page has finally put some science behind the recently popular argument that the United States isn’t a democracy any more. And they’ve found that in fact, America is basically an oligarchy.

An oligarchy is a system where power is effectively wielded by a small number of individuals defined by their status called oligarchs. Members of the oligarchy are the rich, the well connected and the politically powerful, as well as particularly well placed individuals in institutions like banking and finance or the military.

For their study, Gilens and Page compiled data from roughly 1,800 different policy initiatives in the years between 1981 and 2002. They then compared those policy changes with the expressed opinion of the United State public. Comparing the preferences of the average American at the 50th percentile of income to what those Americans at the 90th percentile preferred, as well as the opinions of major lobbying or business groups, the researchers found out that the government followed the directives set forth by the latter two much more often.

It’s beyond alarming. As Gilens and Page write, “the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.” In other words, their statistics say your opinion literally does not matter.

That might explain why mandatory background checks on gun sales supported by 83% to 91% of Americans aren’t in place, or why Congress has taken no action on greenhouse gas emissions even when such legislation is supported by the vast majority of citizens.

This problem has been steadily escalating for four decades. While there are some limitations to their data set, economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez constructed income statistics based on IRS data that go back to 1913. They found that the gap between the ultra-wealthy and the rest of us is much bigger than you would think…

(Read Full Text)

Apr 19 - 12,723 notes » via - source + reblog
# huh




hysterifun:

when ur parents go out food shopping

image


Apr 19 - 390,754 notes » via - source + reblog
# ah yes# come back parents# well dad# come back dad# i already ate the rest of the bread




i-effed-it-all-up:

"enchantée" more like "enchantake me now you french hottie"

image


Apr 18 - 2,387 notes » via - source + reblog




[x]

Apr 18 - 826 notes » via - source + reblog
# lady sif




How do we tell the good guys from the bad guys? 

If they’re shooting at you, they’re bad. 

Apr 18 - 9,750 notes » via - source + reblog
# captain america# the winter soldier




upallnightogetloki:

transmutes:

genebeanbelcher:

callmekitto:

thenorsebros:

Marvel Charades with Anthony Mackie

YOU NEED TO WATCH THE VIDEO, THE GIF SET DOESN’T DO IT JUSTICE, YOU DON’T HEAR THE SILLY NOISES HE MAKES IN THE GIF SET

 (c/o varlandgear)

 #i believe anthony mackie can save the world (c/o genebeanbelcher)

The Spider-man noises alone were worth it

Apr 17 - 23,121 notes » via - source + reblog
# anthony mackie# anthony mackie for king




teapotsahoy:

petermorwood:

You can’t draw from back-carry unless the sword is very short. (Try it with a broom-handle through a belt-buckle to hold it in place.) This sword is not short enough, which is why there are four edits to get it out of the scabbard. Filming in one take would show what a dopey concept this is.I have never EVER seen a genuine period illustration or read a genuine period description of a European sword worn this way for combat.
Japanese period art does show swords across the back, but also not for combat. They’re clearly carried there for convenience, either because they’re oversized nodachi or because the wearer is a ninja sneaking about without hilt and scabbard sticking out fore and aft.

This kind of nit-pickery is my jam

teapotsahoy:

petermorwood:

You can’t draw from back-carry unless the sword is very short. (Try it with a broom-handle through a belt-buckle to hold it in place.) This sword is not short enough, which is why there are four edits to get it out of the scabbard. Filming in one take would show what a dopey concept this is.

I have never EVER seen a genuine period illustration or read a genuine period description of a European sword worn this way for combat.

Japanese period art does show swords across the back, but also not for combat. They’re clearly carried there for convenience, either because they’re oversized nodachi or because the wearer is a ninja sneaking about without hilt and scabbard sticking out fore and aft.

This kind of nit-pickery is my jam

Apr 17 - 7,756 notes » via - source + reblog
# oh yeah